Skip to content

SOLUTION // PPM

Planisware

saason-premise

Enterprise PPM reference for large organizations. Gartner APMR Leader 4th year. Gartner Peer Insights Customers' Choice. Two products: Enterprise (large accounts) and Orchestra (mid-market). 600 clients in 30+ countries. Euronext Paris listed.

Vendor: Planisware SA (Euronext: PLNW) / HQ: Paris, France / Founded 1996

Independent analysis - no commercial ties with Planisware SA (Euronext: PLNW)

GLOBAL SCORE

4.1

Top 1 Project Portfolio Management (PPM)
Vendor vision and market positioning
4.7
Functional capabilities
4.6
Vendor robustness
4.5
Technical fit
4.2
Legal and contractual terms
4.0
Solution adoption
3.5
Solution deployment
3.0
Pricing and costs
2.6

Strengths and weaknesses

Most complete PPM functional depth on the market (portfolio, scheduling, resources, finance)
Gartner APMR Leader 4 consecutive years, Peer Insights Customers' Choice
Euronext Paris listed, financial transparency and longevity
Enterprise interface perceived as complex for occasional users
Long and costly implementation (6-12 months)
Partner ecosystem more limited than Planview

Detailed evaluation across 40 criteria

Vendor vision and market positioning 4.7
Product vision and strategic roadmap 5

Project Economy vision with AI. Two complementary products: Enterprise + Orchestra. Predictive AI and forecasting roadmap.

Analyst positioning 5

Gartner APMR Leader 4th year. SPM Challenger. Customers' Choice 2024 (4.6/5 SPM, 4.5/5 PPM). Forrester SPM Leader. Most complete PPM market recognition.

Growth dynamics and market share 4

Euronext Paris (PLNW). 800 employees, 18 offices, 600 clients in 30+ countries. North American expansion (2 Canada data centers 2025).

Functional capabilities 4.6
Portfolio management and prioritization 5

Strategic portfolio management reference. Scoring, what-if, capacity planning, pipeline, strategy-execution alignment. Gartner Critical Capabilities 3.66/5 IT Project Management.

Project planning 5

Advanced planning. Interactive Gantt, dependencies, CPM, WBS, baselines, milestones. Waterfall, agile and hybrid. Among the most robust enterprise scheduling.

Resource management 5

Enterprise resource management. Capacity planning, multi-project allocation, skills, staffing simulation. Historical differentiator.

Progress tracking and EVM 4

EVM supported. Solid progress tracking with plan vs actual comparison and forecasts. Not at Deltek Cobra specialization level.

Project financial management 5

Complete project financial management. Budgets, re-estimates, commitments, P&L, Capex/Opex. Deep ERP integration. Historical strength.

Risk and issue management 4

Risk registers, probability/impact scoring, mitigation. Integrated. Decent without being the main differentiator.

Demand management and stage-gate 5

Configurable demand intake, pipeline, stage-gate (gate count, go/no-go criteria, scoring, committees). Among the most mature demand management.

Portfolio reporting and dashboards 4

Solid executive dashboards and portfolio reporting. Precise and deep. Less visually modern than work management solutions.

Workflow, governance and phase-gate 5

Approval chains, audit trail, multi-level governance, phase-gate (gate reporting, decision history, phase templates). PPM enterprise heritage.

Ecosystem integration 4

SAP PS, Oracle, Jira integrations. REST API. Solid connectors but ecosystem less open than Planview (Tasktop).

Technical fit 4.2
Security and access 4

SSO, SAML, MFA. Enterprise standards. Canada data centers 2025 for sovereignty.

Data security and integrity 4

Cloud SaaS and on-premise. Encryption, audit trail. GDPR. Listed French vendor.

Platform performance 4

Performant for 500+ project portfolios. Proven architecture. Some feedback on interface heaviness with large volumes.

Client ecosystem compatibility 4

SAP PS, Oracle, Jira. REST API. Solid enterprise connectors.

SLA and technical support 5

Gartner Customers' Choice. Responsive and competent support. Very positive client relationship feedback.

Technical documentation 4

Solid documentation. Training, certifications. Growing community.

Solution adoption 3.5
Usability and user experience 3

Powerful but complex interface. Enterprise perceived as heavy for occasional users. Orchestra has more modern UX.

Methodology support 5

Waterfall, agile (Scrum, Kanban) and hybrid in a single portfolio. One of the few native multi-method enterprise PPMs.

Visual reporting capabilities 4

Advanced Gantt, roadmaps, executive dashboards. Solid visual reporting. Less 'aesthetic' than modern solutions but deeper.

Client references and retention rate 4

600 enterprise clients, 30+ countries. Dana, Northrop Grumman. Life sciences, industry, aerospace.

Change management support 3

Training and certifications available. Change management via partners and internal teams.

Change management risk 2

Significant learning curve for Enterprise. Functional richness implies heavy training. G2 feedback: overwhelming interface.

Vendor robustness 4.5
Financial viability 5

Euronext Paris (PLNW). Complete transparency. Listed independent structure.

Installed base and industry experience 4

600 clients, 30+ countries. Aerospace, defense, life sciences, industry. Strong enterprise concentration.

Roadmap and release cadence 5

Visible R&D. Predictive AI, Orchestra mid-market, geographic expansion. High innovation pace for a PPM vendor.

Partnership mindset and openness 4

Gartner Customers' Choice. Solid partnership. Partner ecosystem more limited than Planview.

Solution deployment 3.0
Deployment ease 2

Enterprise 6-12 months. Orchestra 3-6 months. Specialized consultants needed. Complex implementation.

User training quality 3

Training and certifications available. Complexity requires significant training investment.

API standards and availability 4

REST API. Open architecture. Modern standards.

Third-party resource availability 3

Growing partner ecosystem but more limited than Planview or Oracle. Limited number of specialized consultants.

Legal and contractual terms 4.0
General terms and specific clauses 4

Transparent T&Cs. Listed French vendor, native GDPR. Rigorous approach.

Contractual flexibility 4

SaaS and on-premise. Deployment flexibility. Negotiable conditions. Human-scale vendor.

Pricing and costs 2.6
Price range and licensing 3

High-end enterprise. Unpublished. Orchestra more accessible for mid-market.

Deployment cost intensity 2

Costly implementation especially Enterprise. Specialized consultants. High license/implementation ratio.

Pricing model transparency 2

Unpublished. Complex model (Enterprise vs Orchestra, modules). Limited readability.

Delivery model variety 4

SaaS and on-premise. Canada data centers for sovereignty.

Other TCO-impacting costs 2

Significant consulting, training, maintenance costs. High enterprise TCO.

Recommended use cases

  • Large organizations with complex portfolios (500+ projects, multi-BU)
  • Enterprise PMO requiring strategy-execution-finance alignment
  • Life sciences, aerospace, industry sectors needing the deepest governance

About Planisware SA (Euronext: PLNW)

Vendor: Planisware SA (Euronext: PLNW)

Headquarters: Paris, France

Founded: 1996

Deployment: saas, on-premise

Website

Category: Project Portfolio Management (PPM)

Alternative solutions

Compare Planisware with alternatives

Launch the Project Portfolio Management (PPM) comparator with Planisware pre-selected.

Compare now

Frequently asked questions about Planisware

Is Planisware suited for mid-market companies?
With an adoption score of 3.5/5, Planisware is well-positioned for mid-market thanks to its accessibility and manageable learning curve. Enterprise PPM reference for large organizations.
Planisware vs Planview (PPM Pro / AdaptiveWork / Portfolios): which one to choose?
Planisware scores 4.1/5 overall versus 3.9/5 for Planview (PPM Pro / AdaptiveWork / Portfolios). Planisware stands out for most complete ppm functional depth on the market (portfolio, scheduling, resources, finance). Planview (PPM Pro / AdaptiveWork / Portfolios) may be preferred for different requirements. The interactive comparator lets you fine-tune based on your context.
How much does Planisware cost?
The pricing score for Planisware is 2.6/5. High-end enterprise. Unpublished. Orchestra more accessible for mid-market.
Does Planisware integrate with SAP / Oracle / Microsoft?
The technical integration score for Planisware is 4.2/5. SAP PS, Oracle, Jira. REST API. Solid enterprise connectors.