SOLUTION // PPM

Celoxis

saason-premise

Complete mid-market PPM: planning, resources, finance, governance. Integrated AI (LEX). 400+ integrations. Cloud and on-premise. Most competitive pricing ($10-45/user/month). 20+ years experience. Optimal functional/price balance for structured mid-market PMOs.

Vendor: Celoxis Technologies Pvt. Ltd. / HQ: Mumbai, India / Founded 2001

Independent analysis - no commercial ties with Celoxis Technologies Pvt. Ltd.

GLOBAL SCORE

3.7

Pricing and costs

4.4

Solution deployment

4.0

Functional capabilities

3.7

Technical fit

3.7

Solution adoption

3.7

Legal and contractual terms

3.5

Vendor vision and market positioning

3.3

Vendor robustness

3.0

Strengths and weaknesses

Most competitive pricing in the comparator ($10-45/user/month)

PPM/resources/finance/governance balance for structured PMOs

400+ integrations and cloud + on-premise deployment

Not in Gartner MQ, limited analyst recognition

Less strategic SPM depth than Planisware or Planview

Agile support less advanced than enterprise solutions

Detailed evaluation across 40 criteria

Vendor vision and market positioning 3.3

Product vision and strategic roadmap 4

Complete PPM vision for structured PMOs. LEX AI predictive analytics. Jira, Azure DevOps connector. Coherent mid-market ambition.

Analyst positioning 2

Not in Gartner MQ. Cited in independent comparisons and best-of lists. Positioned in niche solutions tier.

Growth dynamics and market share 4

20+ years experience. Enterprise and mid-market clients. Steady growth. Longevity and stability.

Functional capabilities 3.7

Portfolio management and prioritization 4

Real-time dashboards, customizable KPIs, executive reports. Complete visibility. Strategy-execution alignment.

Project planning 4

Interactive Gantt, dependencies, critical path, baselines, milestones. Solid mid-market and mid-size scheduling.

Resource management 4

Advanced resource planning: workload, skills, availability. Overallocation prevention. Intelligent allocation. Strength.

Progress tracking and EVM 3

Decent progress tracking. No dedicated EVM. Plan vs actual performance tracking. Suited for mid-market.

Project financial management 4

Integrated financial tracking: budgets, billing, profitability. Financial performance and ROI visibility. Recognized strength.

Risk and issue management 3

Basic risk management. LEX AI risk prediction. Functional without being main differentiator.

Demand management and stage-gate 3

Demand intake and pipeline. Configurable workflow. Configurable stage-gate (go/no-go, scoring). Decent mid-market.

Portfolio reporting and dashboards 4

Advanced reporting. Customizable real-time dashboards. KPIs, drill-down, export. Reporting and analytics depth.

Workflow, governance and phase-gate 4

Configurable workflows, approval paths, audit trail. 400+ integrations. Solid governance for structured PMOs. Configurable phase-gate.

Ecosystem integration 4

400+ integrations (Jira, Azure DevOps, QuickBooks, Slack via Zapier). REST API. Native Jira connector. Wide mid-market.

Technical fit 3.7

Security and access 4

SSO, RBAC. Enterprise standards.

Data security and integrity 4

Cloud and on-premise. Encryption, audit trail. GDPR. Suited for governance/compliance constraints.

Platform performance 4

Scalable enterprise. Good volume management without significant degradation.

Client ecosystem compatibility 4

400+ integrations. Jira, Azure DevOps, QuickBooks, Slack. REST API. Open ecosystem.

SLA and technical support 3

Decent mid-market support. Less feedback volume than Leaders.

Technical documentation 3

Decent. Knowledge base. Community more limited than Leaders.

Solution adoption 3.7

Usability and user experience 4

Interface appreciated by PMOs. Real-time dashboards, intuitive visualization.

Methodology support 3

Mainly waterfall. Kanban boards improving. Basic hybrid. Less agile than Planview or Planisware.

Visual reporting capabilities 4

Customizable dashboards, interactive Gantt, resource heatmaps. Decent and appreciated for mid-market.

Client references and retention rate 3

Mid-market base. 20+ years. Various sectors. Volume below Leaders but notable longevity.

Change management support 4

Free 14-day trial. Facilitated onboarding. Intuitive interface reduces heavy training need.

Change management risk 4

Moderate curve. Intuitive interface. Suited for PMOs seeking complete without enterprise complexity.

Vendor robustness 3.0

Financial viability 3

Private. No public data. Stable (20+ years) but limited visibility.

Installed base and industry experience 3

Mid-market base. 20+ years. Various sectors. Below Leaders.

Roadmap and release cadence 3

LEX AI, Jira connector. Regular releases. Decent without exceptional.

Partnership mindset and openness 3

Decent client relationship feedback. Human-scale vendor.

Solution deployment 4.0

Deployment ease 4

Fast. Free 14-day trial. Intuitive configuration. Faster than enterprise.

User training quality 4

Intuitive interface reduces training need. Online resources.

API standards and availability 4

REST API. 400+ integrations. Modern standards.

Third-party resource availability 4

Autonomous implementation possible thanks to intuitive interface. Less consultant dependency.

Legal and contractual terms 3.5

General terms and specific clauses 4

Transparent T&Cs.

Contractual flexibility 3

Cloud subscription or on-premise purchase. Standard mid-market.

Pricing and costs 4.4

Price range and licensing 5

Most competitive. $10/user/month (Core) to $45/user/month (advanced). Significantly cheaper than all enterprise.

Deployment cost intensity 5

Fast and inexpensive. Autonomy possible. No heavy consultant dependency. Most favorable ratio.

Pricing model transparency 5

Published and transparent pricing. 3 clear tiers. Free 14-day trial. Most transparent.

Delivery model variety 4

Cloud and on-premise. Deployment flexibility suited for governance constraints.

Other TCO-impacting costs 3

Low TCO. Modest evolution and customization costs. Designed for PMO autonomy.

Recommended use cases

Mid-market PMOs seeking a complete PPM at competitive price
Organizations with balanced planning/resources/finance/governance needs
Mid-size companies seeking fast deployment with cloud and on-premise

About Celoxis Technologies Pvt. Ltd.

Vendor: Celoxis Technologies Pvt. Ltd.

Headquarters: Mumbai, India

Founded: 2001

Deployment: saas, on-premise

Website

Category: Project Portfolio Management (PPM)

Alternative solutions

Sciforma (Planview ProjectAdvantage / Vantage)

3.7

Triskell

3.7

Cora Systems

3.6

Planview (PPM Pro / AdaptiveWork / Portfolios)

3.9

Compare Celoxis with alternatives

Launch the Project Portfolio Management (PPM) comparator with Celoxis pre-selected.

Compare now

Frequently asked questions about Celoxis

Is Celoxis suited for mid-market companies?

With an adoption score of 3.7/5, Celoxis is well-positioned for mid-market thanks to its accessibility and manageable learning curve. Complete mid-market PPM: planning, resources, finance, governance.

Celoxis vs Sciforma (Planview ProjectAdvantage / Vantage): which one to choose?

Celoxis scores 3.7/5 overall versus 3.7/5 for Sciforma (Planview ProjectAdvantage / Vantage). Celoxis stands out for most competitive pricing in the comparator ($10-45/user/month). Sciforma (Planview ProjectAdvantage / Vantage) may be preferred for different requirements. The interactive comparator lets you fine-tune based on your context.

How much does Celoxis cost?

The pricing score for Celoxis is 4.4/5. Most competitive. $10/user/month (Core) to $45/user/month (advanced). Significantly cheaper than all enterprise.

Does Celoxis integrate with SAP / Oracle / Microsoft?

The technical integration score for Celoxis is 3.7/5. 400+ integrations. Jira, Azure DevOps, QuickBooks, Slack. REST API. Open ecosystem.