Skip to content

SOLUTION // PPM

Triskell

saas

Enterprise Strategy Execution Management solution with advanced PPM. Multi-portfolio, no-code, agile + waterfall + hybrid. Highly configurable. Accessible pricing (from 15 euros/month). Industries: banking, insurance, pharma. European configurable high-end positioning.

Vendor: Triskell Software / HQ: Bilbao, Spain / Founded 2012

Independent analysis - no commercial ties with Triskell Software

GLOBAL SCORE

3.7

Top 3 Project Portfolio Management (PPM)
Solution deployment
4.0
Pricing and costs
4.0
Functional capabilities
3.9
Solution adoption
3.8
Vendor vision and market positioning
3.7
Technical fit
3.5
Legal and contractual terms
3.5
Vendor robustness
3.0

Strengths and weaknesses

Most configurable multi-portfolio on the market (build/run, projects/services/products)
No-code: workflows, scoring, governance configuration without development
Very accessible pricing for an enterprise PPM (from 15 euros/month)
UI not always clean, CRM and third-party tool integrations improvable
No native mobile application
Installed base more limited than Leaders, very limited partner ecosystem

Detailed evaluation across 40 criteria

Vendor vision and market positioning 3.7
Product vision and strategic roadmap 4

Unified Strategy Execution Management vision. No-code. Agile, waterfall, hybrid. Differentiating for European mid-to-enterprise.

Analyst positioning 3

Referenced in Gartner Peer Insights SPM. Not Leader/Challenger in main MQs. Cited in independent configurable PPM comparisons.

Growth dynamics and market share 4

European presence (banking, insurance, pharma). Growing base. European high-end.

Functional capabilities 3.9
Portfolio management and prioritization 5

Multi-portfolio (build/run, projects/services/products). Advanced what-if scenario planning. Scoring, prioritization, alignment. Triskell's core.

Project planning 4

Gantt, Scrum boards, milestones. Waterfall, agile, hybrid in a single portfolio. Flexible and configurable.

Resource management 4

Capacity planning, allocation, skills. Weekly/monthly/quarterly planning. Integrated time tracking.

Progress tracking and EVM 3

Decent progress tracking. KPI, milestones, progress tracking. No dedicated EVM. Strategic PMOs more than detailed controls.

Project financial management 4

Budgets, costs, allocations. Configurable attributes. Financial management integrated with portfolio.

Risk and issue management 3

Basic risk management. Configurable registers. Functional without differentiator.

Demand management and stage-gate 4

Integrated demand management. Configurable intake. Stage-gate (no-code go/no-go criteria, committees, scoring). Suited for end-to-end PMOs.

Portfolio reporting and dashboards 4

Configurable dashboards, portfolio reporting, real-time KPIs. Multi-views (portfolio, program, team).

Workflow, governance and phase-gate 5

No-code: workflows, scoring models, governance rules, forms. Multi-portfolio governance. Audit trail. One of the most configurable without development. Complete no-code phase-gate.

Ecosystem integration 3

Integrations available but ecosystem more limited than Planview or Celoxis. CRM and third-party improvable. REST API.

Technical fit 3.5
Security and access 4

SSO. Data encryption. Enterprise standards.

Data security and integrity 4

Cloud SaaS. Encryption, audit trail. GDPR. European vendor.

Platform performance 3

Decent mid-to-enterprise. No significant performance feedback. Cloud.

Client ecosystem compatibility 3

CRM and third-party improvable. REST API. Growing but limited integration ecosystem.

SLA and technical support 4

Responsive vendor, attentive, good commercial guidance. Careful client relationship.

Technical documentation 3

Decent. No-code reduces need for in-depth technical documentation.

Solution adoption 3.8
Usability and user experience 4

Configurable and intuitive for IT and business users. No-code configuration. Setup ease and flexibility.

Methodology support 5

Agile, waterfall, hybrid in a single environment. Multi-portfolio with different practices. Strong methodological differentiator.

Visual reporting capabilities 4

Customizable dashboards, multi-views. Solid portfolio and program visualization.

Client references and retention rate 3

Europe (banking, insurance, pharma). Growth. Volume more limited than Leaders.

Change management support 4

Responsive vendor, personalized guidance. Fast deployment. No-code facilitates autonomy.

Change management risk 3

Moderate curve with no-code, intuitive interface. Full familiarization takes time. Smooth initial adoption.

Vendor robustness 3.0
Financial viability 3

Private European. No public data. Stable in niche but limited visibility.

Installed base and industry experience 3

Europe. Banking, insurance, pharma. Growth but limited volume vs Leaders.

Roadmap and release cadence 3

Continuous innovation. Active roadmap. Moderate pace vs Leaders.

Partnership mindset and openness 3

Positive vendor relationship feedback. Reactive partnership approach. Very limited partner ecosystem.

Solution deployment 4.0
Deployment ease 4

Fast no-code deployment. Quick configuration without development. Faster than heavy enterprise.

User training quality 4

No-code reduces technical training need. Intuitive interface. Training available.

API standards and availability 4

REST API. Modern standards.

Third-party resource availability 4

Implementation often by Triskell team. Direct guidance. Less third-party dependency.

Legal and contractual terms 3.5
General terms and specific clauses 4

Transparent T&Cs. European vendor, native GDPR.

Contractual flexibility 3

Cloud subscription. From 15 euros/month. Standard.

Pricing and costs 4.0
Price range and licensing 5

From 15 euros/month. Among the most accessible for configurable enterprise PPM. Excellent features/price ratio.

Deployment cost intensity 4

No-code. Moderate deployment costs. No heavy consultant dependency.

Pricing model transparency 4

Published (15 euros/month). More transparent than most enterprise.

Delivery model variety 3

Cloud SaaS. No documented on-premise option.

Other TCO-impacting costs 4

Low TCO with no-code and fast deployment. Evolution costs controlled by configuration autonomy.

Recommended use cases

  • European enterprise PMOs with complex multi-practice portfolios (agile + waterfall)
  • Organizations seeking high-end configurable PPM without development (no-code)
  • Banking, insurance, pharma sectors with advanced portfolio governance needs

About Triskell Software

Vendor: Triskell Software

Headquarters: Bilbao, Spain

Founded: 2012

Deployment: saas

Website

Category: Project Portfolio Management (PPM)

Alternative solutions

Compare Triskell with alternatives

Launch the Project Portfolio Management (PPM) comparator with Triskell pre-selected.

Compare now

Frequently asked questions about Triskell

Is Triskell suited for mid-market companies?
With an adoption score of 3.8/5, Triskell is well-positioned for mid-market thanks to its accessibility and manageable learning curve. Enterprise Strategy Execution Management solution with advanced PPM.
Triskell vs Sciforma (Planview ProjectAdvantage / Vantage): which one to choose?
Triskell scores 3.7/5 overall versus 3.7/5 for Sciforma (Planview ProjectAdvantage / Vantage). Triskell stands out for most configurable multi-portfolio on the market (build/run, projects/services/products). Sciforma (Planview ProjectAdvantage / Vantage) may be preferred for different requirements. The interactive comparator lets you fine-tune based on your context.
How much does Triskell cost?
The pricing score for Triskell is 4.0/5. From 15 euros/month. Among the most accessible for configurable enterprise PPM. Excellent features/price ratio.
Does Triskell integrate with SAP / Oracle / Microsoft?
The technical integration score for Triskell is 3.5/5. CRM and third-party improvable. REST API. Growing but limited integration ecosystem.