Skip to content

PERFORMANCE VECTORS // EPM // PPM // TMS

Align strategy, capital and execution

Financial performance management, project portfolio management and treasury. For organizations that demand visibility, control and measurable outcomes.

What we see in the field

CFOs steering with spreadsheets stitched across subsidiaries. PMOs without capacity visibility, arbitrating projects on intuition. Treasurers managing cash day-to-day with no forward view. The problem is not the absence of tools — it is the absence of architecture. Without a unified performance layer, strategic decisions are made blind.

4 services

EPM / FP&A

Financial performance steering: budgets, rolling forecasts, group consolidation and management reporting. Platform implementation or redesign (Anaplan, OneStream, Pigment, CCH Tagetik, Workday Adaptive). Target model scoping, cube and workflow design, deployment support and adoption engineering.

Compare EPM solutions →

PPM / PMO

Project portfolio strategy, investment arbitration, capacity and resource planning. Implementation of Planisware, Planview, Sciforma or Triskell. PMO governance design, template and KPI definition, strategic alignment on OKRs or corporate objectives.

Compare PPM solutions →

TMS / Treasury

Real-time cash visibility, FX and rate risk management, multi-protocol bank connectivity (SWIFT, EBICS, API). Selection and deployment of Kyriba, ION, Coupa Treasury or GTreasury. Liquidity steering, group pooling and netting.

Compare TMS solutions →

AMOA / Delivery Engineering

Project leadership on critical programs. Synchronization between operational execution and the P&L. Integrator steering, release governance, strategic committee facilitation. Tooled approach: trajectory, milestones, measurable acceptance criteria.

Discuss your project →

Before / After

Before

  • Departmental and subsidiary silos
  • Manual entry, double rekeying
  • Monthly reporting delayed 5 days
  • Project arbitration without capacity planning
  • Cash forecast at D+10

After

  • Integrated multi-entity platform
  • Automated flows from ERP and banks
  • Real-time shared dashboards
  • Scenario-based project arbitration
  • Continuous cash visibility, informed decisions

Frequently asked questions

How do you select an EPM tool for a mid-market company?
The primary criterion is internal budgeting process maturity, not company size. Workday Adaptive or Pigment fits a mid-market organization with a simple cycle. Anaplan or OneStream becomes necessary when modeling is complex or multi-entity. Our EPM comparator scores 15 platforms across 40 criteria to surface the right match.
Planisware or Planview for an enterprise PMO?
Planisware excels on R&D and industrial portfolios with strong inter-project dependencies. Planview is better suited for cross-functional portfolios oriented around capacity planning and strategic alignment. The choice hinges on the decision center of gravity: execution governance or resource optimization.
Which TMS for a multi-bank international mid-market?
Kyriba remains the reference for multi-protocol bank connectivity and geographic coverage. Coupa Treasury is compelling if the ERP is already Coupa. For simpler structures, Nomentia or TIS deliver a better functionality-to-cost ratio.
What does an EPM deployment cost?
License cost varies from 50K to 500K+ EUR/year depending on platform and user count. Implementation runs 3 to 6 months for a simple budgeting cycle (Pigment, Workday Adaptive) and 6 to 12 months for a multi-module Anaplan or OneStream rollout. Beyond 12 months, the project is typically under-scoped or carries an organizational transformation component.
What is a realistic PPM implementation timeline?
A focused PPM deployment (single entity, standard governance) takes 4 to 6 months. Enterprise-scale transformations with custom workflows, multi-entity rollout and change management run 9 to 18 months. The critical-path variable is almost always organizational readiness, not technology.
What does a PMO need to deliver in 2026?
Beyond portfolio reporting: real-time capacity visibility, scenario-based investment arbitration, automated resource-demand matching and strategic alignment scoring. The PMO of 2026 is a decision-intelligence hub, not a status-reporting office.