SOLUTION // EPM

Cube

saas

Spreadsheet-native FP&A platform working in Excel AND Google Sheets (unique advantage). G2 4.5/5. Integrated agentic AI. Among the fastest onboarding on the market. Founded by former CFO. Technical limitations (4 dimensions, no drilldown) that distinguish it from enterprise solutions.

Vendor: Cube Software (VC-backed) / HQ: New York, NY, USA / Founded 2018

Independent analysis - no commercial ties with Cube Software (VC-backed)

GLOBAL SCORE

3.1

Solution deployment

4.3

Pricing and costs

3.8

Solution adoption

3.7

Technical fit

3.2

Vendor vision and market positioning

3.0

Legal and contractual terms

3.0

Functional capabilities

2.6

Vendor robustness

2.3

Strengths and weaknesses

Only platform native to both Excel AND Google Sheets simultaneously

Among the fastest onboarding on the market (2-4 weeks)

Integrated agentic AI for variance analysis and Slack/Teams Q&A

4 predefined custom dimensions limit flexibility

No drilldown, major limitation for sophisticated finance teams

Performance degrading with large datasets and multiple templates

Detailed evaluation across 40 criteria

Vendor vision and market positioning 3.0

Product vision and strategic roadmap 3

'Spreadsheet-native FP&A' with agentic AI. Excel + Google Sheets. PowerPoint app coming. Coherent for segment.

Analyst positioning 2

Not included in Gartner MQ. Cited in G2 and independent analyses. No Forrester/Nucleus/BARC recognition.

Growth dynamics and market share 4

Significant raises. Founded by former CFO. Rapid mid-market growth. Startup dynamics.

Functional capabilities 2.6

Budgeting and financial planning 3

Centralized Excel/Sheets budgeting. Actualization automation. Standard functional mid-market.

Modeling and simulation 3

Synchronized spreadsheet modeling. 4 predefined dimensions limit complex model flexibility.

Workforce planning 2

Basic coverage. No dedicated module.

Operational planning 2

Limited coverage. Financial FP&A. No native demand/supply chain.

Statutory and management consolidation 1

No statutory consolidation. Basic management conso.

Strategic steering 3

Customizable dashboards. Executive reporting. Decent standard mid-market.

Reporting and analytics 3

Excel/Sheets reporting. Cube dashboards. Decent but complex reports slow to generate.

Validation workflows and approval chains 3

User controls, audit trails. Collaboration supported. Functional mid-market.

Profile security and access management 3

Access control, audit trail. Decent mid-market.

Data integration 3

NetSuite, QuickBooks, Xero, Salesforce, HubSpot. Import difficulties and long import times reported.

Technical fit 3.2

Security and access 3

SSO. Decent mid-market standards.

Data security and integrity 3

Cloud SaaS. Encryption, audit trail. Decent standards. Fewer documented certifications.

Platform performance 3

Decent for small volumes. Slowdowns with large datasets and multiple templates reported on G2.

Client ecosystem compatibility 4

Excel AND Google Sheets (unique advantage). Mid-market ERP. API. Dual spreadsheet support differentiator.

SLA and technical support 3

Decent support. Mixed feedback. Lighter training materials.

Technical documentation 3

Growing. More guided onboarding than traditional documentation. Youth shows.

Solution adoption 3.7

Usability and user experience 4

Appreciated spreadsheet-native. Fast onboarding. Productive quickly in Excel or Google Sheets. Web interface too.

Excel integration 5

Spreadsheet-native. Excel AND Google Sheets (unique). Data sync, formulas preserved.

Dynamic charting capabilities 3

Customizable Cube dashboards. Decent but less advanced than integrated BI solutions.

Client references and retention rate 2

Growing base but still limited volume. Masterworks cited. Fewer enterprise logos.

Change management support 3

Fast onboarding. Spreadsheet familiarity minimizes change. Lighter materials.

Change management risk 5

Very low risk. Teams continue in spreadsheets (Excel or Sheets). Nearly transparent.

Vendor robustness 2.3

Financial viability 2

VC startup. No public data. Founded by former CFO (credibility) but no longevity guarantee.

Installed base and industry experience 2

Growing but limited base. Volume below Datarails and far below established.

Roadmap and release cadence 3

Agentic AI, PowerPoint app. Frequent releases. Youth = functional limitations being resolved.

Partnership mindset and openness 2

Decent but nascent ecosystem. No integrator partner network. Cube team dependency.

Solution deployment 4.3

Deployment ease 5

Among the fastest (2-4 weeks). Minimal learning curve. Spreadsheet base nearly immediate.

User training quality 4

Little training needed. Familiar interface. Admins accompanied by support.

API standards and availability 3

API available. Decent standards. Fewer advanced options than mature.

Third-party resource availability 5

By Cube team directly. No external consulting. Minimal cost.

Legal and contractual terms 3.0

General terms and specific clauses 3

Standard startup/SaaS T&Cs.

Contractual flexibility 3

Quote-based pricing (historically $1,500/month). Standard SaaS.

Pricing and costs 3.8

Price range and licensing 4

Historically $1,500/month ($18K/yr). Now quote-based. Mid-market.

Deployment cost intensity 5

Onboarding 5x faster than Datarails per feedback. By Cube team, minimal cost.

Pricing model transparency 3

Historically published (3 tiers). Now quote-based. Transition toward less transparent.

Delivery model variety 2

SaaS only. No on-premise/private cloud.

Other TCO-impacting costs 5

Low TCO. No external consulting, fast implementation, updates included. High predictability.

Recommended use cases

Small finance teams (5-30 people) seeking to structure their spreadsheets
Organizations using Google Sheets (only native Sheets option on the market)
Scale-ups with tight budget and 2-4 week go-live need

About Cube Software (VC-backed)

Vendor: Cube Software (VC-backed)

Headquarters: New York, NY, USA

Founded: 2018

Deployment: saas

Website

Category: Enterprise Performance Management (EPM)

Alternative solutions

Prophix

3.2

IBM Planning Analytics

3.3

Datarails

3.3

Planful

3.4

Compare Cube with alternatives

Launch the Enterprise Performance Management (EPM) comparator with Cube pre-selected.

Compare now

Frequently asked questions about Cube

Is Cube suited for mid-market companies?

With an adoption score of 3.7/5, Cube is well-positioned for mid-market thanks to its accessibility and manageable learning curve. Spreadsheet-native FP&A platform working in Excel AND Google Sheets (unique advantage).

Cube vs Prophix: which one to choose?

Cube scores 3.1/5 overall versus 3.2/5 for Prophix. Cube stands out for only platform native to both excel and google sheets simultaneously. Prophix may be preferred for different requirements. The interactive comparator lets you fine-tune based on your context.

How much does Cube cost?

The pricing score for Cube is 3.8/5. Historically $1,500/month ($18K/yr). Now quote-based. Mid-market.

Does Cube integrate with SAP / Oracle / Microsoft?

The technical integration score for Cube is 3.2/5. Excel AND Google Sheets (unique advantage). Mid-market ERP. API. Dual spreadsheet support differentiator.